NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Patricia Cretney v State of New South Wales [2008] NSWIRComm 131
Applicant: Patricia Cretney PARTIES: Respondent: State of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC7430 of 2003
CORAM: Kavanagh J
CATCHWORDS: s106 application - unfair contract - allegation conduct of departmental investigation into school management unfair to staff member- recommendation for formal investigation of matters which may be disciplinary - recommendation for transfer of applicant in any circumstance - recommendation not acted upon - recommendations not findings nor proposed findings - applicant given procedural fairness - departmental policy followed - departmental procedures meet procedural fairness rules - no application of principle of legal coherence - distress suffered not related to unfairness in contract - no evidence of damage to reputation or defamation - application dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Abboud v The State of NSW (Department of School Education) (1999) 92 IR 32 Banas v State of New South Wales [2003] NSWIRComm 317 Bowker & Anor v Software Engineers Australia (NSW) [2004] NSWIRC 104 CGU Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Garcia (2007) Aust Torts Reports 81-908 Hyde v Energy Australia (1999) 92 IR 409 CASES CITED: Hunter Area Health Service v Presland (2005) 63 NSWLR 22 Mitchforce v Industrial Relations Commission (2003) 57 NSWLR 212 New South Wales v Paige (2002) 60 NSWLR 371 State of New South Wales v Banas (2004) 137 IR 63 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 Sydney Water Corporation Ltd and Anor v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & Anor [2004] 61 NSWLR 661 Truelove v Sydney Water Corporation Limited [2005] 146 IR 253
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate