NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Police V Inthavong [2009] NSWLC 2
JURISDICTION: Criminal
PARTIES: Police Inthavong
FILE NUMBER:
PLACE OF HEARING: Downing Centre
DATE OF DECISION: 02/06/2009
MAGISTRATE: Chief Magistrate G L Henson
CATCHWORDS: Dishonestly obtain benefit by deception
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 - Section 178BA (1)
Johnson V The Queen [2004] 78 ALJR 616 Postiglione V THe Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R V Assi (2006) NSWCCA257 R V Cicekdag (2004) 150 A Crim R 299 R V Doan (2000) 50 NSWLR R V Douar (2005) 159 A Crim R 154 R V Mak [2006] NSWCCA 381 R V McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 CASES CITED: R V Molesworth [1999] NSWCCA 43 R V Mungomery (2004) 151 A Crim R 376 R V Pantano (1990) 49 A Crim R 328 R V Pierce (1998) 194 CLR 610 R V Pont (2000) 121 A Crim R R V Taylor [2000] NSWCCA 442 R V Thomson & Houlten (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R V Walker [2005] NSWCCA 109 R V Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Siganto V R (1998) 194 CLR 656
TEXTS CITED:
REPRESENTATION:
ORDERS:
1) The offender is charged with 17 counts of dishonestly obtaining a benefit by deception. The charges were laid during August and September 2008 following reports of fraudulent behaviour from former employers of the offender to police. Each prosecution is brought pursuant to Section 178BA of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty for an offence contrary to the provisions of Section 178BA of the Crimes Act 1900 is five years imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate