NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Seeto - V - Marrickville Council [1999] NSWLEC 70
PARTIES APPLICANT: SEETO
RESPONDENT: MARRICKVILLE COUNCIL
NUMBER: 10802 of 1998
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: :- Question of law - amendment of application
LEGISLATION CITED: Question of law - amendment of application
DATES OF HEARING: 02/02/1999
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 02/02/1999
Applicant: P R Clay Solicitors: Adams & Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: G A Christmas Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: 1. This is the determination of a preliminary question of law raised by the respondent. The determination of the question separately from any other question is made pursuant to the Supreme Court Rules Pt 31 r 2(1) which applies to this Court by dint of the Land and Environment Court Rules Pt 6 r 1(1).
2. T he question of law is framed as follows:
"Whether the application pursuant to s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 the subject of these proceedings may be lawfully amended in the manner sought by the applicant or whether such an amendment must be by way of a new application to the respondent".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate