NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 118 LGERA 264
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Holroyd City Council v Skyton Developments Pty Limted [2001] NSWLEC 259 PROSECUTOR Holroyd City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT Skyton Developments Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50070; 50071; 50072 of 2001 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- statement of essential legal ingredients of an offence. Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 26, s 76A, s 76A(1)(b), s 125, s 125(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 1991 cl 18 Holroyd City Council Tree Preservation Order 2000, cl 4 Cameron v Lake Macquarie City Council (2000) 107 LGERA 308; Director of Public Prosecutions v United Telecasters Sydney Limited (1989 - 1990) 168 CLR 594; Ex parte Lovell; Re Buckley and Another (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 153 ; Hornsby Shire Council v Denise ("Densey") Clyne (Talbot J, NSWLEC, 29 October 1998, unreported); CASES CITED: Hornsby Shire Council v Winsloe (1998) 101 LGERA 117; John L. Proprietary Limited v The Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales (1987) 163 CLR 508; Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Ryde City Council (1998) 108 LGERA 352; Rao v Canterbury City Council (2000) 112 LGERA 360; Vines v Djordjevitch (1955) 91 CLR 512 DATES OF HEARING: 05/11/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/16/2001
PROSECUTOR Mr T G Howard (Barrister) SOLICITORS McKees Legal Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr M L Wright (Barrister) SOLICITORS Deacons Graham & James
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate