NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 122 LGERA 118
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Virotec International Ltd [2001] NSWLEC 290 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Virotec International Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 50074 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- effect of complying with provisions of the Mining Act 1992 on pollution of waters. Clean Waters Act 1970 s 16, s 16(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Interpretation Act 1987 s 35(1)(a), s 34(4)(a) Marine Pollution Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED: Mining Act 1992 s 64, s 73(1A), s 74, s 380, s 381 Mining Act 1973 Pollution Control Act 1970 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 3(a), s 6, s 7, s 7(1), s 7(2), s 7(3), s 48, s 120, s 120(1), s 122, s 257 Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 1998 cl 52 Mining Rehabilitation and Environmental Management Plan 1989 CASES CITED: Bromley and Others v Forestry Commission of New South Wales (2001) 51 NSWLR 378; Electricity Commission of New South Wales v Environment Protection Authority (1992) 28 NSWLR 494 DATES OF HEARING: 12/11/2001, 14/11/2001, 15/11/2001, 16/11/2001, 19/11/2001, 20/11/2001, 21/11/2001, 22/11/2001, 23/11/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/14/2001
PROSECUTOR: Mr SJ Rushton SC with Mr J Smith (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr AL Hill with Mr DA Caspersonn (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Greg Judd & Associates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate