NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Grogan -v- Superior Fire Services [2006] NSWIRComm 1049
APPLICANT PARTIES: Paul Grogan RESPONDENT Superior Fire Services Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): 5065 of 2005
CORAM: Cambridge C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal - termination of employment - alleged poor work performance - absence of proper warning of unsatisfactory work performance - erroneous implementation of dismissal - dismissal held as harsh, unreasonable and unjust - reinstatement or re-employment impractical - compensation Ordered
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW]
HEARING DATES: 27/03/06,28/03/06
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/28/2006
APPLICANT Mr. A Metcalf, barrister Solicitors for Applicant, Employment Help Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr. A Joseph, barrister Solicitors for Respondent Brown & Partners
DECISION: - 2 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE
28 March 2006
Matter No IRC 5065 of 2005
Paul Grogan -v- Superior Fire Services Pty Ltd
Application by P Grogan re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
EXTEMPORE DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm 1049 1 This matter involves a claim for unfair dismissal. The claim was made pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW], (the Act). The claim was filed on 29 September 2005, by Employment Help Lawyers acting for Paul Grogan (the applicant). The application named the respondent employer as Superior Fire Services Pty Ltd (the employer).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate