NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 109 LGERA 343
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Australian Posters Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council [2000] NSWLEC 195 APPLICANT: Australian Posters Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Leichhardt Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10773 of 1999 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- Whether proposed advertising structure prohibited development Whether appeal site has benefit of existing use entitlements LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 S 97, S 106, S 107 Auburn Council v Nehme (unreported 15 April 1998); Gameplan v South Sydney City Council (1999) NSWCA 223; Hudak v Waverley Municipal Council (1990) 70 LGRA 130; Manicaland Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council, (unreported 12 December 1997); CASES CITED: P Bartol and Associates Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council (unreported 26 April 1996; Penrith Waste Services Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (1998) 101 LGERA 98; Perrin v Peters (1983) 48LGRA 123 at 125; Randwick Corporation v Rutledge (1959) 102 CLR 54; Storey v North Sydney Municipal Council (1970) 123 CLR 574· Sydney City Council v Royal Agricultural Society (1985) 56LGRA 443; Waverley Municipal Council v Attorney General (1979) 40 LGRA 419 DATES OF HEARING: 05/06/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/31/2000
APPLICANT: Mr I Hemmings, Barrister SOLICITORS NRG Legal LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr P Jackson, Solicitor SOLICITORS Pike Pike and Fenwick
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate