NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Australian Workers Union v. Omya (Australia) Pty Limited [2006] NSWIRComm 1078
APPLICANT Australian Workers Union PARTIES: RESPONDENT Omya (Australia) Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 6477 of 2005
CORAM: Connor C
CATCHWORDS: industrial dispute - interpretation of award provision - issues of jurisdiction - obligation on employer to pay for employee training - claim for payment for time spent in training by employees - claim refused
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Bryce v. Apperley (1998) 82 IR 448 Kellogg (Australia) Pty Limited v. National Union of Workers (1998) 89 IR 391 CASES CITED: Maldoc Pty Limited v. Bollard - unreported New England Area Health Services Case - unreported Nowra Coaches Case - unreported
HEARING DATES: 09/05/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/02/2006
APPLICANT Dave Hancock Australian Workers Union
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Gordon Jervis Australian Business Lawyers
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: CONNOR C
Friday, 2 June, 2006
Matter No IRC 6477 of 2005
Australian Workers Union and Omya (Australia) Pty Limited
Dispute notification under S.130 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 re claim to recoup costs of training
DECISION
[2006] NSWIRComm 1078
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate