NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Richard & Ors v Shoalhaven City Council [2002] NSWLEC 11 APPLICANTS: Reginald Benjamin Richard John Laurence Orford PARTIES : Dawn Audrey Orr
RESPONDENT: Shoalhaven City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40126 of 2001 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- whether lapsed LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 95, s 95(1)(a), s 95(4) Local Government Act 1993 s 315 CASES CITED: Noble House Corporation Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [1999] NSWLEC 190, unreported; Young and Another v Warringah Shire Council [2001] NSWLEC 208, unreported DATES OF HEARING: 07/11/2001 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/07/2001
APPLICANTS: Mr D.R. Parry (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Kearns & Garside LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr G.N. Gleeson (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Morton & Harris
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40126 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 7 November 2001
Reginald Benjamin Richard, John Laurence Orford Dawn Audrey Orr Applicants v Shoalhaven City Council Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. HIS HONOUR: In this matter there is an agreed statement of facts supported by a number of affidavits which provide more detailed evidence of critical matters which need to be decided.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate