NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Johnston v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWLEC 226 APPLICANT Johnston PARTIES : RESPONDENT Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales FILE NUMBER(S) : 30443 of 1998 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- award of compensation for land acquisition exceeding assessment of respondent but less than the compensation claimed - respondent increasing valuation assessment during hearing - applicant awarded disturbance items - applicant deemed successful - apportionment of costs not justified LEGISLATION CITED: Valuation of Land Act 1916 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 ; Cummings v Lewis (1993) 113 ALR 285; Dodds Family Invesments Pty Limited v Lane Industries Pty Limited & Ors 26 IPR 261 ; Haig v The Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (unreported 1996, NSWLEC 58) ; Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) (1986) 8 ATPR 40-748; CASES CITED: J-Corp Pty Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers Federated Union of Workers, Western Australian Branch & Anor (No 2) [1992] 46 IR 301 ; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 ; Pastrello v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWLEC 209 ; Queensland Wire Industries Pty Limited v BHP Co Limited (1987) 17 FCR 211; In re Elgindata Ltd [No 2] [1992] 1 WLR 1207 ; Rukavina & Robertson v Wagga Wagga City Council (1993) 80 LGERA 8 DATES OF HEARING: 19/10/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/27/2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate