NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Detala Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2000] NSWLEC 63 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Detala Pty Ltd ACN 003 504 372 RSPONDENT: Byron Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10515 of 1994 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Practice & Procedure :- Court orders - whether court has power to reopen proceedings to make fresh order - power to alter date of development consent Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, s 83(5), LEGISLATION CITED: Land & Environment Court Act 1979, s69, s22, 39(5), s56, s59 Land & Environment Court Rules, Part 15 rule 5, Part 10 rule 7 Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529; Haig v The Minister (1994) 85 LGERA 143; CASES CITED: Emanuele v Australian Securities Commission (1997) 188 CLR 114; L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) (1982) 151 CLR 590; R v Lapa (1995) 80 CrimR 398; Wilcox v Richardson [1994] NSWCA 192 DATES OF HEARING: 10/02/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/31/2000
APPLICANT: T Robertson (barrister} SOLICITORS: Bartier Perry LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: W R Davison SC AND D R Parry (barrister) SOLICITORS: Wilshire Webb
JUDGMENT:
Contents
Paragraph
A question of time 1
The parties' submissions 8
The Court's jurisdiction to make the order 12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate