NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Brooklyn Resort Pty Ltd - V - Hornsby Council [1999] NSWLEC 6
PARTIES Applicant Brooklyn Resort Pty Ltd
Respondent Hornsby Council
NUMBER: 10432 of 1998
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: :- Payment of development application fee whether to Court or Respondent
LEGISLATION CITED: Payment of development application fee whether to Court or Respondent
DATES OF HEARING: 12/16/1998
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 02/04/1999
Applicant A H J Commons (s) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent J E Robson
JUDGMENT:
1. The applicant has brought an appeal under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, s 97, against a determination by the respondent to refuse its consent to a development application. The proposed development in this case is designated development under s 77A of that Act. That fact requires the public exhibition and notification of the application in accordance with s 79. Formal public exhibition and notification in accordance with that section had not been undertaken when the application in this Court was filed because the respondent was not satisfied that the information accompanying the development application was complete. In determining to refuse the application the respondent refunded all but a portion of the development application fee which had been paid by the applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate