NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 122 LGERA 319
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v Homestake Australia Limited and Ors. [2002] NSWLEC 155 APPLICANT: Williams PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Homestake Australia Limited and Ors. FILE NUMBER(S) : 40010 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- Order for inspection of property and relics. LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Rules Part 25 Rule 8 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 ss 85 and 87 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 14 August 2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/11/2002
APPLICANT: Mr A Oshlack, Agent SOLICITORS N/A
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS: 1st Respondent Mr M Brennan, Solicitor 2nd Respondent Mr C Ireland, Solicitor SOLICITORS 1st Respondent Blake Dawson Waldron 2nd Respondent Blake Dawson Waldron
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40010 of 2002 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 11 September 20002
NEVILLE WILLIAMS
Applicant
v
HOMESTAKE AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 007 857 598
First Respondent
BARRICK GOLD OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 007 143 137
Second Respondent
DIRECTOR-GENERAL NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Third Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J: A. INTRODUCTION
1. By Notice of Motion filed 6 August 2002, the Applicant seeks an order setting aside an interlocutory order made by the Court on 12 July 2002 for inspection of property and a substitute order permitting inspection of property by the Applicant and others including the Applicant's consulting archaeologist.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate