NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Robert Whyte and Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWIRComm 84
APPLICANT Robert Whyte PARTIES: RESPONDENT Commissioner of Police
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 191 and 1260 of 2009
CORAM: Sams DP
POLICE ACT 1990 – application for a review of two orders of the Commissioner of Police made under s 173 of the Act – reduction in increment from Sergeant Level 7/8 to Senior Constable Level 6 – officer of 20 years standing – two orders identical – sixteen issues investigated – allegations of unauthorised COPS access for personal purposes – allegations of harassment of a member of the public – failure to declare conflict of interest – alleged untruthfulness in directed interviews – use of police resources for personal reasons without permission – wearing of police uniform to a Tribunal – incorrect or misleading entries in mandatory training records – falsification of firearms training scores – failure to enter custody records for four juvenile persons – failure to enter custody record for arrested person – alleged viewing of strip search – inconsistencies between applicant's interview and email – breakup in relationship between applicant and another officer – date which applicant knew of former partner's new relationship – applicant's explanations and reasons for conduct – whether explanations believable – Investigators appointed to investigate various issues – directed interviews with applicant – Investigators found all allegations proven on the balance of probabilities – whether Investigators fair, independent and unbiased – whether applicant denied access to relevant documents – applicant provide detailed responses to notices – allegations of procedural unfairness – whether decision maker failed to give consideration to relevant matters – whether decision maker failed to have proper regard for applicant's responses – whether decision maker misdirected himself or was misdirected by others – relevance of the use of the term 'integrity' in notices and orders – failure to follow mandatory procedures – failure to take account of Industrial Relations Commission decisions and precedents – subpoenaed documents – conflict in witness evidence – consideration of criminal investigation – decision maker concludes all allegations proven on balance of probabilities – applicant in breach of various Police Codes, Policies, Guidelines and relevant provisions of the Police Act and other Acts – criminal investigation of untruthfulness not pursued – orders made to reduce applicant's rank and increment – whether orders 'harsh, unreasonable or unjust' or 'beyond power' – principles of review proceedings considered – applicant seeks revocation of orders – competing interests of applicant and public interest – character references and long period of excellent service. CATCHWORDS:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate