NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mirvac Projects Pty Ltd v Ku-Ring-Gai Municipal Council [2001] NSWLEC 103 APPLICANT: Mirvac Projects Pty Ltd
PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ku-Ring-Gai Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11173 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice & Procedure :- Motion by developer for leave to rely upon amended development plans LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996, Pt 13 r 16(b1) CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 1 May 2001 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 05/01/2001
APPLICANT: Ms J Ware, Solicitor SOLICITORS Coudert Brothers
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms K O'Hagan, Solicitor SOLICITORS Pike Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 11173 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 1 May 2001
MIRVAC PROJECTS PTY LTD
Applicant
v
KU-RING-GAI COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
1. This is Motion for leave pursuant to the Rules of Court Pt 13 r 16 par b(1) by the Applicant to a pending Class 1 appeal which has been fixed for hearing on 28 - 31 May 2001 to rely upon amended plans of the development proposal initiated by the Applicant. The Council does not consent to the Applicant's reliance upon the amended plans which are detailed in the affidavit sworn by Jennifer Ware dated 27 April 2001, hence the need for the Motion to the Court for leave. The Council does not only not consent, but opposes the grant of leave.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate