NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: McKinnon v Prime Practice Pty Limited [2006] NSWIRComm 254
APPLICANT Su Margaret McKinnon PARTIES: RESPONDENT Prime Practice Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1837 of 2006
CORAM: Staff J
CATCHWORDS: Practice and procedure - Notice of motion - Unfair dismissal application - Application by respondent for adjournment of hearing - Practice Direction 17 - Clear and compelling reasons required for adjournment - Interests of other parties considered - Whether prejudice to the applicant - Adjournment refused
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Craig Maguire and Plasdene Glass-Pak Pty Limited [2006] NSWIRComm 112 Dedov v Apollo Life Sciences Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 55 CASES CITED: Gu v Nature's Care Manufacture Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 39 Pritchard v Trident Global Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 83 Zammit v KTS Logistics Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 36
HEARING DATES: 03/08/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/07/2006
APPLICANT Agent: Mr M J Booth Employment Advocacy Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr R Goot SC Solicitor: Mr R Jarvin Prentice Jarvin
JUDGMENT:
- 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: STAFF J
7 August 2006
Matter No IRC 1837 of 2006
SU MARGARET McKINNON v PRIME PRACTICE PTY LTD
Application by Su Margaret McKinnon pursuant to s 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 re unfair dismissal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate