NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 110 LGERA 318
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fencott Drive Pty Ltd v Lake Macquarie City Council [2000] NSWLEC 146 APPLICANT: Fencott Drive Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Lake Macquarie City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10871 of 1999 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- (i) is development site an "existing holding" in terms of LEP (ii) is provision of LEP a development standard LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 Bell v Shellharbour Municipal Council (1993) 78 LGERA 419; Christies Sands Pty Ltd v City of Tea Tree Gully (1975) 37 LGRA 325; Dixson v Wingecarribee Shire Council (1999) 103 LGERA 103; CASES CITED: Kruf v Warringah Shire Council (unreported LEC 25 December 1988 per Holland J); Ku-Ring-Gai Municipal Council v Kuttner (1980) 41 LGRA 1; North Sydney Municipal Council v P D Mayoh Pty Limited (No 2) (1990) 71 LGRA 222; Pancho Properties Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council per Talbot J; [1999] NSWLEC 245; Rusell v Brisbane City Council (1955) St R Qd 419; DATES OF HEARING: 27/04/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/12/2000
APPLICANT: Mr W R Davison SC with Mr D Parry SOLICITORS Mr P Hines
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr B Preston SC SOLICITORS: Mr P Rees
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate