NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Police Association of NSW on behalf of Craig Clifton v NSW Police Force [2009] NSWIRComm 197
Police Association of NSW on behalf of Craig Clifton (Applicant) PARTIES: NSW Police Force (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC2401 of 2008
CORAM: Kavanagh J
CATCHWORDS: POLICE - Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005 - purpose and proper application of cl 9.3 - determination made that officer had "on duty" injuries to knees but a psychological "off duty" injury - determination under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 required as to whether the Police Officer was injured at work - first consideration must be fair as it affects determination as to what is the appropriate benefit paid to officer - procedure followed as to question of on-duty/off-duty not fair - rehabilitation and retraining not given - payment is for compensation for the loss of career - appropriate payment for a terminated officer - "partial and permanent disability benefit" or a "permanent disability benefit" - psychological condition secondary to knee injury - one injury - work a substantial contributing factor - reasonable act of employer not causally connected to condition - payment awarded under cl 9.3 not cl 9.4
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Workers Compensation Act 1987
Dayton v Coles Supermarkets Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 153 Marton Cook v TAFE Commission (1999) 17 NSWCCR 632 Mercer v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (2000) 48 NSWLR 740 CASES CITED: Police Association of New South Wales (on behalf of Sahra Gulbis) v Commissioner of Police [2008] NSWIRComm 187 Ray v Radano [1967] AR NSW 471 Rootsey v Tiger Nominees Pty Ltd (2002) 23 NSWCCR 725 Stimson v NSW Police Service [2008] NSWIRComm 196
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate