NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Tanya Mazza, Peter Shalala, Anthony La Grazia & Gregory Nettle v Syddeck Pty Ltd trading as Royale Limousines and anor. [2006] NSWIRComm 80
APPLICANTS: Tanya Mazza Peter Shalala Anthony La Grazia Gregory Nettle PARTIES: RESPONDENTS: Syddeck Pty Ltd t/as Royale Limousines and Peter John Bartolotta
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 3328, 4273, 4792 & 5404 of 2003
CORAM: Haylen J
CASES CITED: Mazza & ors v Syddeck Pty Ltd t/as Royale Limousines and anor [2006] NSWIRComm 44
HEARING DATES: 09/03/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/09/2006
APPLICANTS: Mr A Metcalfe of counsel SOLICITORS: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Employment Lawyers
RESPONDENTS: Mr J Bartolotta on behalf of both respondents
JUDGMENT: INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: HAYLEN J 9 March 2006
Matter No IRC 3328 of 2003 Tanya Mazza v Syddeck Pty Ltd t/as Royale Limousines and anor. Application under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996
Matter No IRC 4273 of 2003 Peter Shalala v Syddeck Pty Ltd t/as Royale Limousines and anor. Application under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996
Matter No IRC 4729 of 2003 Anthony La Grazia v v Syddeck Pty Ltd t/as Royale Limousines and anor. Application under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996
Matter No IRC 5404 of 2003 Gregory Nettle v Syddeck Pty Ltd t/as Royale Limousines and anor. Application under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 JUDGMENT [2006] NSWIRComm 80
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate