NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Murton v TD Preece and Co. Pty Ltd [2006] NSWIRComm 367
Applicant: Rick Murton PARTIES: Respondent: TD Preece and Co. Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 6239 of 2002
CORAM: Backman J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - whether applicant a contracting party - s 108 of the Act considered - applicant found to be party to an arrangement with the respondent and Windjar Pty Ltd - whether circumstances of termination rendered the contract unfair - contract found unfair - orders.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Brown v Rezitis (1970) 127 CLR 157 Buckman and Another v Burdekin Resources N/L (1998) 85 IR 415 Burks v Zanmarl Pty Limited (2000) 107 IR 187 Director General of the Department of Corrective Services v Mitchelson (1992) 26 NSWLR 648 CASES CITED: Faraci v The Leak Shop Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 169 Hammond v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 64 Hyde and Others v Energy Australia (previously Metnorth Energy, Orion Energy, Sydney Electricity, Sydney County Council) (1999) 92 IR 409 Metrocall Inc v Electronic Tracking Systems Pty Limited (No. 2) 102 IR 309 Sydney Water Corporation Ltd and Another v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW and Another (2004) 61 NSWLR 661; 141 IR 14 Zahos v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW (2005) 148 IR 208
HEARING DATES: 11/04/2006; 12/04/2006. Written submissions: 24/05/2006, 27/07/2006, 17/08/2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate