NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Virotec International Limited [2002] NSWLEC 110 PROSECUTOR Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT Virotec International Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50074 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- offence proved - whether change in company structure is mitigating factor - application of s 10 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 to corporation Clean Waters Act 1970 s 16 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10, s 10(1)(a), s 10(1)(b), s 16, s 95, s 96 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Regulation 2000 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 120(1), s 241, CASES CITED: Veen v The Queen (No. 2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465 DATES OF HEARING: 27/06/2002, 28/06/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/12/2002
PROSECUTOR Mr G J Plath (Solicitor) SOLICITORS Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr A L Hill (Barrister) with Mr D A Caspersonn (Barrister) SOLICITORS Greg Judd & Associates
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 50074 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 12 July 2002
Environment Protection Authority Prosecutor v Virotec International Limited Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate