NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Denis Crowther t/as Top Gun Cycles Nominal Defendant [2006] NSWLC 2 JURISDICTION: Civil PARTIES: Denis Crowther t/as Top Gun Cycles Nominal Defendatn FILE NUMBER: 111621 of 2005 PLACE OF HEARING: Balmain Local Court DATE OF DECISION: 02/10/2006 MAGISTRATE: Magistrate H Dillon CATCHWORDS: Workers compensation - Recovery action - Assessment of quantum LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Act 1988 s 79 Workers Compensation Act 1987 s 151 Z (1) (d) CASES CITED: Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1 REPRESENTATION: Mr M.J Jenkins instructed by Turkslegal Solicitors MR P Garling SC instructed by Holman Webb Solicitors ORDERS: 1. Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $14,862.01 plus interest calculated from 17 June 1999 by the Registrar pursuant to s 100 Civil Procedure Act. Judgment accordingly.; 2. Costs to follow the event in a sum agreed or assessed.
Judgment
1. The plaintiff's action in this matter is brought pursuant to s.151Z(1)(d) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 seeking recovery of a sum paid in workers' compensation to a bicycle courier, Mr James Morley, who was injured in an accident near the Queen Victoria Building in George St, Sydney on 13 September 1991.
2. On 9 December 2005, I gave reasons for deciding that there ought be a verdict for the plaintiff. The issue of quantum, however, was left open as I had not received submissions from the defendant on that question. Both parties have now ventilated their respective positions in relation to that issue.
3. The plaintiff claims a sum of $19,249.50 in respect of workers' compensation paid, together with interest pursuant to s.100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate