NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Zhang v Canterbury City Council [1999] NSWLEC 209
PARTIES APPLICANT/RESPONDENT: Julie Zhang
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT: Canterbury City Council
NUMBER: 10748 of 1998 and 10749 of 1998
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Section 56A Appeal :- failure to give real consideration to DCP - onus of proof - time limited consent to enable assessment of impact
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A
DATES OF HEARING: 09/06/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 09/08/1999
APPLICANT/RESPONDENT: Mr P W Larkin (Barrister)
SOLICITORS: Steven Klinger LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT/APPELLANT: Mr W R Davison SC
SOLICITORS: Pike Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 10748-9 of 1998 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 8 September 1999
Julie Zhang Applicant/Respondent v Canterbury City Council Respondent/Appellant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. In a reserved judgment dated 11 March 1999, Commissioner Brown upheld an appeal against the refusal of a development application for the use of part of a building at the rear of 303 Beamish Street, Campsie as a brothel.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate