NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Easeport Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2001] NSWLEC 2 APPLICANT Easeport Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 40102 of 2000 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- s 94 contributions plan - privative clause - validity Development Control Plan No 6 - Interim Parking Policy LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 94 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 Leichhardt Developer Contribution Plan - Transport and Access Darling Casino Ltd v New South Wales Casino Control Authority and Ors (1997) 191 CLR 602; CASES CITED: R v Coldham and Ors; Ex parte The Australian Workers' Union (1983) 153 CLR 415; R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox (1945) 70 CLR 598 DATES OF HEARING: 02/11/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/22/2001
APPLICANT Mr G B Newport (Barrister) SOLICITORS George Khoury & Co LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C W McEwen (Barrister) SOLICITORS Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND 40102 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Pearlman J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 22 January 2001
EASEPORT PTY LTD Applicant v LEICHHARDT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate