NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales (on behalf on S & L Bozinovski Pty Ltd and MJW Transport Pty Ltd) and Glen Cameron Nominees Pty Ltd [2007] NSWIRComm 286
APPLICANT Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales PARTIES: RESPONDENT Glen Cameron Nominees Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC64; IRC65 of 2007
CORAM: Sams DP; Macken Dr J; Tinney Mr G
Applications to Contract of Carriage Tribunal - contracts of carriage in the road transport industry - five year contract for delivering of paper - contract not renewed - contract drivers entered into contracts during term of major contract - payment of goodwill to enter the yard - assignment of existing contracts - requirement to sign acknowledgement that goodwill not required to be paid - whether respondent was aware of goodwill payment - terms of contract prevented any compensation for loss of contract - custom and practice of paying goodwill in the yard - hearsay evidence - whether respondent took steps to advise that goodwill was not a requirement to enter the yard - whether respondent offered alternative work to displaced carriers - no offer of alternative work taken up - preliminary jurisdictional issues - whether there was a head contract of carriage - whether the drivers were carriers - whether the respondent a principal contractor - jurisdiction under s 346 of the Act - whether termination of contracts unfair, harsh or unconscionable - whether compensation should be paid by principal contractor. CATCHWORDS: Held; decision of part time members of the Tribunal - unnecessary to determine preliminary jurisdictional issues - premiums or goodwill paid to enter yard - respondent was aware of practice of goodwill being paid - custom and practice established - applicants signed acknowledgement that the respondent did not require goodwill to be paid and that goodwill was not a custom and practice - both applicants were aware of and understood terms of acknowledgement - assigned contracts contained provision for no compensation - both applicants were aware of and understood contract terms - major contract for five years until October 2006 - contracts not renewed - offers of alternative work should have been investigated - jurisdictional hurdle in s 346(1)(e) not overcome - terminations of contracts not harsh, unfair or unconscionable - applications for compensation dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate