Fast Buck$ and Terence Hamill v Dudley Pastoral Pty Limited and Byron Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 100

Land and Environment Court of New South Wales

CITATION : Fast Buck$ and Terence Hamill v Dudley Pastoral Pty Limited and Byron Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 100 APPLICANTS Fast Buck$ and Terence Hamill PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Dudley Pastoral Pty Limited and Byron Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 40064 of 2000 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- the Wednesbury principle - whether evidence relevant and admissible. LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 s 55 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission and Anor (1999) 199 CLR 135 ; CASES CITED: Hale and Ors v Parramatta City Council and Anor (1981-1982) 47 LGRA 269; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Anor v Peko-Wallsend Limited and Ors (1985-1986) 162 CLR 24 ; ULV Pty Ltd v Scott and Ors (1990) 19 NSWLR 190 (CA); Weal v Bathurst City Council and Anor (2000) 111 LGERA 181 (CA); DATES OF HEARING: 27/04/01 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/27/2001

APPLICANTS In Person

SOLICITORS N/A

1st RESPONDENT Mr J B Maston (Barrister) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Wroth Wall

2nd RESPONDENT Mr K Webber

SOLICITORS Wilshire Webb