NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sandlix Pty Limited & Anor v Hurstville City Council [2000] NSWLEC 98 APPLICANT Sandlix Pty Limited & Anor PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hurstville City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10754B of 1999; 10842B of of 1999 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Section 56A Appeal :- Application to re-open pursuant to Pt 15 r 9 - whether application out of time - order signed by Registrar on the same day as the attempted filing of the notices of motion - Court dispensing of rules upon evidence justifying dispensation thereof - leave granted to re-open proceedings - orders disposing of appeal. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 56A Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 1 r 5(2), Pt 15 r 4, Pt 15 r 9(b) CASES CITED: Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 ; Autodesk Inc & Anor v Dyason & Ors [No2] (1992-1993) 176 CLR 300 DATES OF HEARING: 8/5/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/23/2000
APPLICANT Ms J Kelly (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Jacovou & Co LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Rigg (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS Deacons Graham & James
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 10754B of 1999; 10842B of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 23/5/00
Sandlix Pty Limited First Applicant Christopher Neil Second Applicant v Hurstville City Council Respondent JUDGMENT [No 3]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate