NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Gough & Gilmour Holdings Pty Ltd & Ors v Caterpillar of Australia Ltd and Ors [2007] NSWIRComm 3
FIRST APPLICANT Gough & Gilmour Holdings Pty Ltd
SECOND APPLICANT Harcourt David Gough
THIRD APPLICANT Anthony Lansley Gilmour
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Caterpillar of Australia Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Caterpillar Inc.
THIRD RESPONDENT Caterpillar SARL
FOURTH RESPONDENT Caterpillar Overseas Credit Corporation SA
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 5227 of 2000
CORAM: Boland J
Unfair contract - Application by applicants to amend pleadings - Application by respondents to dismiss or permanently stay proceedings - Principles governing dismissal motions - Whether jurisdiction to proceed to deal with claims for compensation in circumstances where the law had changed since Court's finding in 2002 that contracts were unfair - Whether contracts were contracts whereby a person performs work in any industry - Related condition - Collateral arrangement - Consideration of s 106(2A) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - Whether 106(5) only authorises an order for the payment of money in the nature of restitution - Loss of opportunity - Goodwill - Principles governing amendment to pleadings - Whether amendments objectionable - Whether amendments met requirements of r 18A of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 - Whether amendments amounted to further causes of action - Whether amendments were futile - Whether amendments gave rise to prejudice - Whether amendments were in good faith - Whether delay on the part of the applicants was a basis for refusing amendments - Dismissal application refused - Leave granted to amend pleadings CATCHWORDS: Practice and Procedure - Unfair contract - Application by applicants to amend pleadings - Application by respondents to dismiss or permanently stay proceedings - Principles governing dismissal motions - Whether jurisdiction to proceed to deal with claims for compensation in circumstances where the law had changed since Court's finding in 2002 that contracts were unfair - Whether contracts were contracts whereby a person performs work in any industry - Related condition - Collateral arrangement - Consideration of s 106(2A) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - Whether 106(5) only authorises an order for the payment of money in the nature of restitution - Loss of opportunity - Goodwill - Principles governing amendment to pleadings - Whether amendments objectionable - Whether amendments met requirements of r 18A of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 - Whether amendments amounted to further causes of action - Whether amendments were futile - Whether amendments gave rise to prejudice - Whether amendments were in good faith - Whether delay on the part of the applicants was a basis for refusing amendments - Dismissal application refused - Leave granted to amend pleadings
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate