NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Marcolongo & Anor -V- Pittwater Council [1999] NSWLEC 85
PARTIES APPLICANT: Marcolongo & Anor
RESPONDENT: Pittwater Council
NUMBER: 10901 of 1998
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- unzoned land - whether relevantly regulated
Land & Environment Court Rules LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 Pittwater Local Environmental Plan 1993
DATES OF HEARING: 04/06/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 04/15/1999
APPLICANT: D P Wilson SOLICITORS: Greg Dunstan & Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: I J Hemmings SOLICITORS: Malleson Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR:
1. This is the separate determination of preliminary questions of law pursuant to the Supreme Court Rules Pt 31 r 2(1), which is applied to this Court by the Land & Environment Court Rules Pt 6 r 1(1).
2. Four questions were initially referred to me for determination. The parties agreed that the first question was a question of fact and not a question of law. The parties also agreed that the fourth question was no longer one which needed to be answered. Accordingly the following two questions as framed by the respondent remain: (1) Whether the effect of part of the land being unzoned, having regard to the terms of the Pittwater Local Environmental Plan 1993 and section 76B(b) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 is that the development of the land for all purposes, including subdivision, is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate