NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Bowen v Willoughby City Council [2000] NSWLEC 197 APPLICANT: Bowen PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Willoughby City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10064 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Question of law raised by Council for preliminary determination in pending class 1 proceedings. Whether exceptional circumstances demonstrated to justify a cost order. LEGISLATION CITED: Bell v Shellharbour Municipal Council (1993) LGERA 429; Cadonia Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council (unreported 5 August 1994); Dixson v Wingecarribee Shire Council (1999) 103 LGERA 103 Frisoli v Leichhardt Council (1996) NSWLEC 157; MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2) (2000) 107 LGERA 211; CASES CITED: McKay v North Sydney Council (2000) 107 LGERA 203; Nahum v North Sydney Council (1994) 83LGERA 2000; North Sydney Council v P D Mayoh Pty Ltd (No 2) (1990) 71 LGRA 222; Outdoor Australia Pty Ltd v Auburn Council (1996) 89 LGERA 365; Pancho Properties Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council (1999) NSWLEC 245; Quinn O'Hanlon Architects Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1989) 68 LGRA 114 DATES OF HEARING: 08/06/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/31/2000
APPLICANT: Mr P Tomasetti, Barrister SOLICITORS Corrs Chambers Westgarth LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr J Underwood, Barrister SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate