NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Kimberley Leigh and DS and C Hanison tas Crackle N Spit [2008] NSWIRComm 1040
APPLICANT Kimberley Leigh PARTIES: RESPONDENT DS and C Hanison t/as Crackle N Spit
FILE NUMBER(S): 356 of 2008
CORAM: McLeay C
CATCHWORDS: Unfair dismissal - shop assistant - teleconference - first conciliation unsuccessful - applicant not available for second or third conferences - notice properly given - no explanation provided - respondent sought dismissal of application - principles considered - no decision as to whether claim was frivolous - application dismissed for want of prosecution.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Hakim and Hakcom Investments Pty Ltd & Anor [2004] NSWIRComm 405 CASES CITED: Raymond Hoser v Christopher Hartcher [1999] NSWSC 527 Mealey v Council of the City of Sydney (2004) 132 IR 177 State of Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15 May 2008
APPLICANT Kimberley Leigh (self) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT David Hanison (self)
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: McLEAY C
15 May 2008
Matter No IRC 356 of 2008
Kimberley Leigh and D S and C Hanison t/as Crackle N Spit
Application by Kimberley Leigh for unfair dismissal against D S and C Hanison t/as Crackle N Spit pursuant to section 84 of the industrial Relations Act
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate