NSW Caselaw
Local Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Beresford v Insurance Australia Ltd [2006] NSWLC 52 JURISDICTION: Civil Stephen Beresford PARTIES: Insurance Australia Ltd T/as NRMA Insurance Child Support Registrar (Amicus curiae) FILE NUMBER: 503/06 PLACE OF HEARING: Downing Centre Local Court DATE OF DECISION: 12/18/2006 MAGISTRATE: Magistrate H Dillon CATCHWORDS: Insurance - Whether notice issued under Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act valid - Whether Whether payment made by insurer to Child Support Registrar voluntary or made in compliance with notice - Whether payment made by insurer reversed proper order of priorities - Whether solicitor had fruits of the action lien at time of payment - Whether payment made under mistake of law - Whether insurer entitled to set off payment Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth) s.72A. LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s.21. Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 ss.80, 95. David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 CASES CITED: Field v Collins (1992) 106 ALR 68 Firth v Centrelink [2002] NSWSC 564 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 Mr R. Goodridge instructed by Firths Solicitors REPRESENTATION: Mr J. Guihot instructed by Hunt & Hunt Mr P. Rodionoff instructed by Australian Government Solicitor (for Amicus curiae) ORDERS: Verdict for the defendant and judgment accordingly. I propose the usual order that costs follow the event in a sum agreed or assessed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate