NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rainbow Force Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 146 APPLICANT Rainbow Force Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Baulkham Hills Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11025 of 2001 CORAM: Pain J Construction and Interpretation :- construction of State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 cl 12 KEY ISSUES: Development Application:- appeal against deemed refusal - merit considerations Baulkham Hills Local Environmental Plan LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97 State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 cl 3, cl 9, cl 12, cl 14, cl 25 CASES CITED: Bardetta v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (Senior Commissioner Roseth, NSWLEC, 1 March 2002, unreported); Hewitt v Hurstville Council [2001] NSWLEC 294 DATES OF HEARING: 15/07/2002 - 19/07/2002, 22/07/2002 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 07/26/2002
APPLICANT Mr I Hemmings (barrister) (day 1-5) Mr C Malley (solicitor) (day 6) SOLICITORS Maclarens Solicitors LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr D Baird (solicitor) with Ms J Wauchope (solicitor) SOLICITORS PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 11025 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Pain J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision date: 26 July 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate