NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Turk v Hunt and Anor [2001] NSWLEC 27 APPLICANT Turk PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Hunt and Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : 30283 of 1999 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- in class 3 - encroachment - no hearing on merits - offers of settlement LEGISLATION CITED: Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 s 14 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 CASES CITED: Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; Re The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 623 DATES OF HEARING: 30/11/2000; 05/02/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/15/2001
APPLICANT Mr P W Larkin (Barrister) SOLICITORS Corrs Chambers Westgarth LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS Mr I J Hemmings (Barrister) SOLCITORS Eakin McCaffery Cox
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND 30283 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT Pearlman J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 15 March 2001
LOIS AGNES TURK Applicant v JOHN WILLIAM HUNT AND MARIA THERESE HUNT Respondents
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. The only issue for the Court to determine in this matter is the question of costs. The parties have settled the substantive proceedings and orders have been made by consent, but the parties have been unable to agree on the question of costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate