NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Dossor v Ballina Shire Council [2001] NSWLEC 173 APPLICANTS PARTIES : David Malcolm Dossor and Ruth Dianne Dossor RESPONDENT Ballina Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10750 of 2000 CORAM: Sheahan J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- residential subdivision - permissibility - consistency with planning objectives - merits issues - concerns deferred for later attention LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Bodyline Spa & Sauna (Sydney) Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 432; Coffs Harbour Environment Centre Inc v Coffs Harbour City Council (1991) 74 LGRA 185; CASES CITED: Hospital Action Group Association Inc v Hastings Municipal Council (1993) 80 LGERA 190; Kanne Pty Ltd v Botany Bay City Council [2001] NSWLEC 163; Schaffer Corporation Ltd v Hawkesbury City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 21 DATES OF HEARING: 28/3/01-30/3/01, 2/4/01-3/4/01 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/01/2001
APPLICANTS Barrister Mr J Robson Solicitors Hallett & Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Barrister Mr N A Hemmings QC Solicitors Allen Allen & Hemsley
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 10750 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Sheahan J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 1 August 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate