NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Weal V Bathurst City Council & Anor [1999] NSWLEC 216
PARTIES APPLICANT Weal
RESPONDENTS Bathurst City Council & Anor
NUMBER: 40179 of 1998
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Costs- Class 4 proceedings challenging development consent-Application fails. Whether unsuccessful Applicant should pay costs.
LEGISLATION CITED: s 69 Land and Environment Court Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 09/13/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 09/14/1999
APPLICANT Mr T S Hale, Barrister SOLICITORS Writer Ryan Boesen
FIRST RESPONDENT Mr W R Davison SC LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS McIntosh McPhillamy
SECOND RESPONDENT Mr D R Parry, Barrister SOLICITORS Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT: TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION 1-5 B. SHOULD THERE BE A COSTS ORDER AGAINST THE UNCUSSESSFUL APPLICANT? 6-15 C. SHOULD EACH RESPONDENT OBTAIN A COSTS ORDER AGAINST THE APPLICANT? 16-18 D. ORDERS 19 IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 40179 of 1998 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 14 September 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate