NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Gerard Landman and Michael Clapham v Grange Securities Limited [2006] NSWIRComm 253
APPLICANT TO THE NOTICE OF MOTION: Grange Securities Limited PARTIES: RESPONDENTS TO THE NOTICE OF MOTION: Gerard Landman Michael Clapham
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2823 & 4560 of 2005
CORAM: Staunton J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - notices of motion - orders sought dismissing applications for relief on three jurisdictional grounds - (i) that remuneration payable or receivable is in excess of remuneration cap provided in s 108A; (ii) that the claims are for breach of contract only as per Sydney Water; (iii) that the claim for tortious conduct is outside Court's jurisdiction - held it cannot be said at this stage that no order could be made in relation to Sydney Water and tortious conduct points that would be within jurisdiction - principle of Nagle v Tilburg and Majik Markets v Brakes and Service Centre applied - motion to dismiss claims on points (ii) and (iii) refused - ascertainment of the remuneration cap as expressed in s 108A - consideration on the facts as to whether bonus paid or received (or payable or receivable) as understood at law - held bonus payment discretionary and at best only claimable at time of termination - remuneration cap provisions of s 108A not offended - discretion arising under s 106 significant in final determination of substantive proceedings - orders sought to have both summonses dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of s 108A refused - order as to costs.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Industrial Relations Amendment (Unfair Contracts) Act 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate