NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 121 LGERA 432
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Blacktown City Council v Pace & Anor [2002] NSWLEC 142 PARTIES : DEFENDANTS Francis George Pace and Joseph Pace FILE NUMBER(S) : 50127 of 2001 CORAM: Pain J Construction and Interpretation :- meaning of use in s 144 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 - meaning of permits in s 144 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 KEY ISSUES: Prosecution:- use of land as waste facilty - not guilty plea - whether offence proven Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 s 69, s 165 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s144 Bonus Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1954) 19 LGR 375; Broad v Parish (1941) 64 CLR 588; Byron Shire Council v The Rising Damp Corporation Pty Ltd [2001] NSWLEC 260; Environmental Protection Authority v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (2000) 112 LGERA 1; Gray's Haulage Co. Limited v Arnold [1966] 1 WLR 534; CASES CITED: Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473; LN Price Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1959) 4 LGRA 63; Lyver v The State of Victoria [1983] 2 VR 475; R v Buckett (1995) 126 FLR 435; Sweet v Parsley [1969] 1 All ER 347; The Corporation of the City of Adelaide v The Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1928) 40 CLR 481; William McKenzie Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1964) 10 LGRA 137 DATES OF HEARING: 19, 20/06/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/20/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate