NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Duke Investments Trust Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 14 APPLICANT: Duke Investments Trust Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Leichhardt Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10238 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J Development Application :- incorrect description of applicant KEY ISSUES: Development Application:- notification - substantial compliance Amendment of Class 1 Application to correct name of party Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1994 reg 48A Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 8 r 8, Pt 20 r 1(3) Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 10 r 1(3), Pt 10 r 2(3) CSR Limited trading as The Readymix Group v Yarrowlumla Shire Council and Anor (unreported 40054 of 1985 2 August 1985); RKO Pictures Inc v Cannon Screen Entertainment Pty Ltd [1990] BCLC 364; CASES CITED: Lazard Bros and Co v Midland Bank Ltd [1933] AC 289; Tetlow v Orela Limited [1920] 2 Ch 24; Alexander Mountain and Co v Rumery Limited [1948] 2 KB 436; McInnes and Others v Wingecarribee Shire Council and Anor (1987) 64 LGRA 137 DATES OF HEARING: 24/11/99 EX TEMPORE 11/24/1999 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT: Mr J J Bingham (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Deacons Graham & James LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr P J Schofield (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Pike Pike & Fenwick
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate