NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Nayla Azar and Dr Sushila Badami (Badami Family Medical Practice) Pty Ltd [2006] [2006] NSWIRComm 1160
APPLICANT PARTIES: Nayla Azar RESPONDENT Dr Sushila Badami
FILE NUMBER(S): 4641 of 2005
CORAM: Murphy C
Costs application by respondent following substantive decision given on 22nd August 2006 dismissing s84 application. CATCHWORDS: Claim made under s181 2 (c) on basis of unreasonable failure to agree to settlement and frivolous and vexatious application. Applicant found to have unreasonably failed to agree to settlement when increasing claims at crucial times, especially in view of lack of merit in application also found to have made frivolous and vexatious application. Costs awarded against applicant, Ms Azar
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Donovan and Blaze on Stage Pty Ltd [2005] NSWIR Comm 1056 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (NSW) and Others (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED: Attorney General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Phillips v Ind Rel Comm of NSW & Anor [2006] NSW CA 183 Bankstown City Council v Paris (1999) 93 IR 209 Four Sons Pty Limited v Sakchai Limsiriphong 2000 100 IR 400
HEARING DATES: 29/09/2006, 06/10/2006.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/26/2006
APPLICANT - Ms N Azar represented herself LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT - Mr Seton of Counsel
DECISION: - 21 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate