NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Flanagan v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWIRComm 7
PARTIES: Michael James Flanagan (Appellant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1151 of 2009
CORAM: Boland J President; Walton J Vice-President; Staff J
CATCHWORDS: POLICE - Police officer removed by Commissioner of Police - Officer involved in an off duty assault and found to have accessed Computerised Operational Policing System (COPS) without authority - Removal upheld at first instance - APPEAL - Whether police officer provoked by well known local criminal - Whether trial judge erred in finding officer was not provoked - Whether trial judge erred in failing to have regard to provocation as a mitigating factor - Whether access to COPS was unauthorised - Whether trial judge erred in finding police officer continued to access COPS after being interviewed about the unauthorised access - Whether there were mitigating circumstances in connection with unauthorised COPS access - Whether the trial judge erred in finding that had the unauthorised COPS access revealed any useful information, the police officer would have used it in his own interest - Whether the trial judge erred in respect of findings relating to the officer's prospects of rehabilitation - Whether the dismissal was harsh, unreasonable or unjust - Commission required under s 181F(3) of the Police Act 1990 to have regard to both the applicant's interest and the public interest is so that it may, in a judicial sense, weigh the respective interests in the balance, consider all the circumstances, and decide whether the removal of the police officer was harsh, unreasonable or unjust - Penalty of dismissal was harsh and unreasonable - Re-employment ordered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate