NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Susan Tansley and Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service [2008] NSWIRComm 83
APPLICANT (Respondent to Motion) Ms S Tansley PARTIES: RESPONDENT (Applicant on Motion) Northern Sydney Central Coast Area Health Service
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC1512 of 2007
CORAM: Sams DP
Notice of motion - application to dismiss matter for want of prosecution - Union applicant on behalf of member - failure to comply with directions - failure to co-operate with Union - Union ceases to act - applicant unwilling to prepare her case - focus on irrelevant issues - Commission not confident that the applicant would prepare her case - Industrial Relations Commission Rules 146 and 147 - principles considered. CATCHWORDS: Held; applicant given reasonable notice of application to dismiss claim - applicant understood ramifications of notice of motion being granted - applicant given generous latitude - continued failure to comply with directions - present circumstances untenable - no confidence applicant's case would be pursued with due diligence or at all - desirable to have quick resolution of litigation - costs and inconvenience - injustice to respondent - notice of motion granted - substantive application dismissed for want of prosecution.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
Crewdson v Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care (2007) 159 IR 446 Hakim and Hakcom Investments Pty Ltd & anor [2004] NSWIRComm 405 CASES CITED: Koprivnjak and Others v Body Corporate Services (NSW) Pty Limited (1999) 87 IR 49 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances ) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 Mealey and the Council of the City of Sydney (2004) 132 IR 177 Piriz v AAPT Limited [2005] NSWIRComm 374
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate