NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Starray Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [2001] NSWLEC 129 APPLICANT Starray Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10605 of 2000 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- appeal pursuant to s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - Senior Commissioner making orders in respect of a development consent which was not the subject of the appeal - orders made in excess of jurisdiction - orders set aside. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 78A, s 96, s 97 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39, s 56A CASES CITED: Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1937) 59 CLR 360; DATES OF HEARING: 31/05/01 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/26/2001
APPLICANT Mr N Hemmings QC
SOLICITORS Allen Allen & Hemsley LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Rares SC with Mr D Miller (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Price WaterhouseCoopers Legal
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 10605 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 26/07/01
Starray Pty Limited Applicant v Sydney City Council Respondent JUDGMENT
Facts
1. These proceedings concern land known as 589-593 George Street, Sydney ("the site"). Since 1985 the site has been used for a 45 space short-stay carpark ("the existing use") on excavated remnant foundations.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate