NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Devro-Teepak Pty Limited [2000] NSWLEC 275 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Devro-Teepak Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50031 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Environmental Offences :- Sentence on plea of guilty—mitigating factors—seriousness of the offence
LEGISLATION CITED: Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, s 120(1) Environment Protection Authority v Norco Corporation Ltd (2000) 108 LGERA 137 ; CASES CITED: Mathews v Goulburn Wool Provisions Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 419; R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; R v Thompson (2000) NSWCCA 309 DATES OF HEARING: 8 December 2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/20/2000
PROSECUTOR: Mr D Jordan, Barrister SOLICITORS Solicitor Environemnt Protection Authority
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr B Preston SC SOLICITORS Coleman and Greig
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 50031 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 20 December 2000
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY Prosecutor v
DEVRO-TEEPAK PTY LIMITED
Defendant
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
A. INTRODUCTION
1. The Defendant has pleaded guilty to a charge of an offence against the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 , s 120(1), (POE Act) in that on or about 26 July 1999 at Bathurst, it polluted waters.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate