NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Valda June Kerrison v New South Wales Technical and Further Education Commission [2007] NSWIRComm 140
APPLICANT Valda June Kerrison PARTIES: RESPONDENT New South Wales Technical and Further Education Commission
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 7143 of 2003
CORAM: Walton J Vice-President; Staunton J; Staff J
CATCHWORDS: Courts and Judges - Application to reopen appeal after judgment - Relevant principles - Failure to identify exceptional circumstances - Absence of irremediable injustice - Proper exercise of discretion - Application to reopen refused - Costs reserved.
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 Technical and Further Education Commission Act 1990
D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid and Anor (2005) 223 CLR 1 Kerrison v New South Wales Technical and Further Education Commission [2003] NSWIRComm 76 Kerrison v New South Wales Technical and Further Education Commission [2003] NSWIRComm 429 Kim Hollingsworth v Commissioner of Police [2007] NSWIRComm 7 CASES CITED: Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 60 ALR 68 New South Wales Technical and Further Education Commission v Valda June Kerrison [2004] NSWIRComm 369 Ove Arup Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (Inspector Mansell) (2005) 141 IR 78 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 29 Vienkata Narasimha Appa Row v Court of Wards; Ex parte Rajah Gopala Appa Row (1886) 11 App Cas 660
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate