NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Trowbridge & Anor -v- Ledbury & Ors [1999] NSWLEC 94
PARTIES Applicants: Trowbridge & Anor
Respondents: Ledbury & Ors
NUMBER: 40054 of 1999
CORAM: Talbot J
:- Decision not to notify nearby property owner of development application - decision to allow SEPP 1 objection - failure to consider particular clauses of DCP KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review:- Manifest unreasonableness Judicial Review:- Alleged failure to make inquiry in respect of matter centrally relevant and reasonably available
Decision not to notify nearby property owner of development application - decision to allow SEPP 1 objection - failure to consider particular clauses of DCP LEGISLATION CITED: Judicial Review:- Manifest unreasonableness Judicial Review:- Alleged failure to make inquiry in respect of matter centrally relevant and reasonably available
DATES OF HEARING: 04/12/1999; 04/13/1999; 04/14/1999; 04/15/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 04/21/1999
Applicants: Mr D P F Officer QC with: Mr J B Maston (Barrister) Solicitors: Wilshire Webb
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate