NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Remath Investments (No. 6) Pty Ltd -V- Botany Bay City Council [No. 3] [1999] NSWLEC 50
PARTIES Applicant: Remath Investments (No. 6) Pty Ltd
Respondent: Botany Bay City Council
NUMBER: 10465 & 14066 of 1997
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: :- leave to re-open after remission from Court of Appeal - stood over to abide lodgement of further EIS
LEGISLATION CITED: leave to re-open after remission from Court of Appeal - stood over to abide lodgement of further EIS
DATES OF HEARING: 03/08/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 03/12/1999
Applicant: Mr C W McEwen (Barrister)
Solicitors: Aitken McLachlan & Thorpe
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr T S Hale (Barrister)
Solicitors: Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 10465-6 of 1997 ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 12 March 1999 REMATH INVESTMENTS (NO. 6) PTY LTD Applicant v
BOTANY BAY CITY COUNCIL [NO. 3] Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate