NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Clarke v Divisional Security (Aust) Pty Limited and Others [2007] NSWIRComm 237
Applicant: Robert Clarke
First Respondent: Divisional Security (Aust) Pty Limited (in liquidation) PARTIES: Second Respondent: Starfinn Pty Limited (in liquidation)
Third Respondent: Lubo Raskovic
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 6254 of 2002
CORAM: Backman J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - application under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - applicant worked as a security officer - contract under which the applicant worked an oral contract whereby applicant paid at an hourly rate of $12, later increased to $14 per hour - whether the work was performed by the applicant or through his service company Apteka Pty Ltd - consideration as to which corporate entity employed the applicant - whether contract between the applicant and the first respondent was unfair - whether contract between the applicant and the first respondent was against the public interest - whether the contract avoided the provisions of the Security Industry (State) Award - whether the contract permitted the first respondent to use a dominant bargaining position - whether the contract was unfair because of the first respondent's conduct in transferring the applicant's employment to the second respondent - whether the first respondent failed to pay the applicant a superannuation guarantee - contract found to be unfair, against the public interest and to avoid the provisions of the Award - whether s 108B of the Act applicable - consideration of third respondent's culpability and liability to pay the whole of underpayment claimed - third respondent culpably associated with the making and operation of the contract - orders - costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate