NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Memel Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2000] NSWLEC 206 APPLICANT: Memel Holdings Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Pittwater Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11035 of 1999 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Section 56A Appeal :- whether Commissioner correctly identified objectives of development standard when considering SEPP 1 objection LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A Australian National Industries Ltd and Ors v Spedley Securities Ltd (In Liq) and Ors (1992) 26 NSWLR 411; Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297; CASES CITED: Coulton and Ors v Holcombe and Ors (1986) 162 CLR 1; Hooker Corporation Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council (Cripps J, 2 June 1986, unreported); Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 DATES OF HEARING: 12/09/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/27/2000
APPLICANT: Mr P R Graham QC with Mr D P Wilson (Barrister)
SOLICITORS: Bradfield & Scott LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms S A Duggan (Barrister)
SOLICITORS: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 11035 of 1999 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 27 September, 2000
Memel Holdings Pty Ltd Applicant v Pittwater Council Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate