NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Vok and anor v Bernard George Madden [2008] NSWIRComm 118
FIRST APPELLANT George Vok (Second respondent at first instance) SECOND APPELLANT PARTIES: Eva Vok (Third respondent at first instance) RESPONDENT Bernard George Madden (Applicant at first instance)
FILE NUMBER(S): 635 of 2008
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract proceedings - application for extension of time to institute appeal - original proceedings arose out of contracts of employment - original proceedings not defended, heard ex parte - application relies on evidence allegedly not available to applicants at time of proceedings - respondent company has been wound up and personal respondents bankrupt - no explanation for delay in seeking extension - no merit in the application - application refused
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 s106 Legal Profession Act 2004
CASES CITED: Madden v Electromagnetic Spectrum Pty Limited and ors [2006] NSWIRComm 354 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Salmon) v Parkes Council (1996) 70 IR 298
HEARING DATES: 13 June 2008 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 13 June 2008
FIRST AND SECOND APPELLANTS In person
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Searle of counsel Solicitor Hicksons Lawyers Ms W Andrews
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate